A man slaughter fanatic is Zinda Pir for sickularist

From old days, the Muslim cruelty was summarized at national level by ‘Aurangzeb’. He was a terrorist. Yet it appeared some were misguided in considering this devil as Zinda Pir …

Fact fact-india website has restated which has been taboo ‘he ordered all temples destroyed, among them the Kashi Vishvanath, one of the most sacred places of Hinduism and had mosques built on a number of cleared temples sites. All other Hindu sacred places within his reach equally suffered destruction, with mosques built on them. A few examples: Krishna’s birth temple in Mathura, the rebuilt Somnath temple on the coast of Gujurat, the Vishnu temple replaced with the Alamgir mosque now overlooking Benares and the Treta-ka-Thakur temple in Ayodhya. The number of temples destroyed by Aurangzeb is counted in 4, if not 5 figures. Aurangzeb did not stop at destroying temples, their users were also wiped-out; even his own brother, Dara Shikoh, was executed for taking an interest in Hindu religion and the Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur was beheaded because he objected to Aurangzeb’s forced conversions.’

Dara Shikoh and Guru Tegh Bahadur was beheaded for objecting to the all round destruction and fanaticism of this cruel terrorist- Aurangzeb.

Now the Chennai police, indoctrinated by dravidian racist thugs like Karunanidhi, have locked up an exibition on Aurangzeb.

http://www.fact-india.com/news.php

http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2008/03/aurangzeb-chennai-art-expo-cancelled_06.html

For the Dravidian racist thugs, the only thing happened is the colonial missionary story of a groups of aryans attacking the dark colored Dravidians after invading from central europe, and then getting the brahmins to create rich tradition in Tamilnadu.

Updt: Analysis on Paki role in converting Aurangzeb

Advertisements

3 Responses

  1. What these protesting Muslims need to understand and appreciate is that Francois Gautier is trying to show precisely that Aurangzeb was a pious Muslim who upheld as many principles of his peaceable faith as he could possibly have. They ought to have justly complimented him! If what Islam requires its adherents to do is opposed to normative human sensibilities, especially in our present ‘age of reason’, it must be seen, from the Muslim point of view, as a consequence of the ignorance and stubbornness rampant in the non-Muslim world.

  2. […] a previous post on Aurangzeb and a link to Paki role […]

  3. […] Times almost competes with British It says the kind of acts by the most dreaded yet devout man slaughter was acting liberally. some more images . There is a link at end of each linked page that goes into […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: